Everyone needs ***ual fulfillment at least from age 14 on. When they
do not get positive ***ual fulfillment, they may turn to perversions:
boots, dominance and submission, bestiality, fisting, scat,
pedophilia, necrophilia, whatever.
Truly ***ual and loving relation****ps are fulfilling. Everyone needs
to be ***ually fulfilled. If this means doing 10 chicks, this means
doing 10 chicks. When they lack ***ual fulfillment because they a) do
not get enough lustful ***, or b) do not get *** with enough people,
or c) do not get enough love, which helps make *** good, - when they
are ***ually unfulfilled, they may turn to perversions. If they are
not ***ually unfulfilled, the possibility that they may turn to
perversions is slim.
Not that I mean to condemn perversions or speak about them in a
derogatory sense. In my mind there's nothing wrong with anything
***ual, so long as it's not destructive or dangerous. So long as it's
safe, it may be something to try. Maybe it would be fun. Apparently
some people on this board view perversions in a derogatory sense
however, so I thought I would make the point that there is little
impetus for perversion for people who are being ***ually fulfilled.
Like whatever turns you on is a fine thing if it's not destructive.
But there is little else to pursue if you're having plenty of good ***
with people you find ***ually attractive. I would imagine perverts
generally don't.
So, *** is positive, good, and necessary for a completely happy and
healthy life.
As the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America
states:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty AND THE PURSUIT OF
HAPPINESS.
Just remember to use birth control. Two types at once if possible.
Taking a risk with an unborn baby is an evil. Two forms of birth
control is safer than a vasectomy or a tubal ligation.
I would recommend condoms and the pull-out method for guys. Condoms,
and hormonal birth control or a barrier method such as a diaphragm for
girls. Once the guys trusts the girl's on hormonal or is using a
barrier method, and if both choose less protection against STD's,
hormonal or barrier method, and pull-out method would be an option.
As would hormonal and a barrier method with no pull-out, but that
leaves it all up to the girl.
Besides, keeping ejaculation out of orifices is the best way to
protect against pregnancy and several STD's. Especially if there are
any cuts or lesions. So pull-out or condoms is probably a plan most
of the time. If a girl's on the pill maybe you want to *** in a her a
few times and she'll want you more. Another alternative to pulling
out could be to **** without a condom, take your dick out, and then
put a condom on before you ***.
Remember that some of these 4 methods are not very safe when used
alone by themselves. For instance if you use just the pull-out
method, or even just the diaphragm or condom by itself you are not
protecting yourself alot against pregnancy... 1 in 333 people per
year seriously do get pregnant while on the pill. Combine that with
the pull out method, and the risk falls to 1 in 832,500. I know that
sounds like a large number, but it's true. See:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian.catholic/browse_thread/thread/b94a937474c2fa76/0bc6f16ece00b864?#0bc6f16ece00b864
Biggest STD worries are herpes and warts. And get tested for
Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Syphilis at least every six months if you're
***ually active with more than one partner cause you could have it
without symptoms and if left untreated too long it could lead to
Pelvic Inflammatory Disorder in women, or Epididymitis in men, both
which can lead to infertility.
Crabs
Scabies
Mollus*** Contagiosum
Trichomoniasis
Using a condom reduces the risk of HIV by 90%.
The risk of HIV is about 1 in 10 per year without a condom if the
other person has it, and thus about 1 in 100 per year with a condom.
The risk someone else has it might be 1 in 10 or 1 in 100 I don't
know. That would translate to 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 per year if
you had only 100 acts per year, and used a condom, or to 1 in 100,000
to 1 in 1,000,000 per act. If you had *** more than this, the risk
would increase, but this might depend on the amount of ejaculation.
If you were a female prostitute doing many men who all had lots of ***
in them, then the risk would increase by number of acts. The risk is
actually re****tedly 8 times safer for hetero***ual men than stated
here.
Keeping ejaculation out of orifices is one of the best way to protect
against pregnancy and several STD's including HIV. Especially if
there are any cuts or lesions. So a condoms or the pull-out method,
either together or combined with a 2nd method, are probably a plan
most of the time.
An recent HIV test probably makes you safer than a condom, but of
course you can't know the person didn't get infected yesterday.
Hopefully there will soon be an over the counter HIV test like a
pregnancy test.
Bacterial Vaginosis, is not actually an STD.
Hepatitis B - there is a vaccine you may consider getting.
If someone has a cold, you should probably not have *** with them or
you could get that cold.
Other rarer diseases:
Chancroid: There are only a few hundred cases of Chancroid in the USA
each year.
Granuloma inguinale or Donovanosis: commonly found in tropical and
subtropical areas such as Southeast India, Guyana, and New Guinea, but
it occurs on occasion in the United States, typically in the
Southeast. There are approximately 100 cases re****ted per year in the
United States.
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV), is highest among ***ually active
people living in tropical or subtropical climates, including some
areas of the southern U.S. LGV is considered endemic in East and West
Africa, India, parts of southeast Asia, South America, and the
Caribbean. Only 42 cases were re****ted in the US in 2000.
CMV/Epstein-Bar/Mononucleousis (CMV) approx 1 in 2 or 50.00% or 136
million people in USA (CMV) (Epstein-Bar) 54.4 million people in USA
carry the virus in their throats (Epstein-Bar). Most healthy people
infected with CMV do not have symptoms, but it could cause mono.
Epstein-Bar is more likely to cause mono, but it does not always. It
often causes only a mild illness, like a cold, or no illness at all.
Epstein-Barr virus permanently infects more than 90% of the people on
Earth, but it causes mononucleosis only in a small minority of them.
In developed nations, such as the United States, mononucleosis most
often develops between the ages of 15 and 25, although it can occur at
any age. After the initial infection, it rarely produces any kind of
illness, but it can be transmitted to others. Symptoms of
mononucleosis usually are most intense during the first two to four
weeks of the illness. However, mononucleosis symptoms, especially
fatigue, can sometimes last for several months.
http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH?d=dmtHealthAZ&c=216693&p=~br,IHW|~st,24479|~r,WSIHW000|~b,*|
Question for mononucleosis:
1. How many cases are there per year?
2. Given that I have read there is an incubation period of between 10
and 60 days during which the infected are more contagious, how
contagious are carriers of the virus who have never acquired symptoms,
or have overcome the disease?
3. Is there a test to see if you and a potential partner have anti-
bodies to protect you from the two viruses which may cause mono?
http://www.drspock.com/faq/0,1511,869,00.html
|
