Noticed at Wed, 21 May 2008 01:03:28 +0100: R. Mark Clayton informed us:
> "Ball Bearing" <cagetype@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:g0v1d5$ava$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Dr John Watson wrote:
>>> Noticed at Tue, 20 May 2008 16:05:45 +0100: R. Mark Clayton informed
>>> us:
>>>
>>>> A lot of rubbish in this post.
>>>>
>>>> A false analogy - even I couldn't drink a pint of whisky without
>>>> throwing up and I have had several years practice. I could very
>>>> easily overdose on most class A & B drugs (although interestingly not
>>>> LSD).
>>>
>>> You are right, but I was aiming the comment at Sun readers.
>>>
>>>> Of course there is harm from using LSD and ecstasy, including
>>>> suicides, mental disturbance, heatstroke and drinking too much water.
>>>> Indeed whilst LSD is not addictive*, it is probably the most
>>>> dangerous recreational drug to use.
>>>
>>> Now, that sounds a lot of rubbish.
>>>
>>>> * psychological dependence can occur.
>>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6474053.stm#drugs
>> LSD can cause a lot of serious problems but I've never known it to
>> cause dependancy.
>>
>>
> First hand observation (sadly) and also do***ented.
Apart from Syd, which the other members of Floyd dispute, who has come to
harm from LSD use?
I've read all the tabloid hysteria - makes you think you can fly, blind by
staring at the sun, stays in your spinal cord and hits you when you least
expect it etc. Is there any do***ented evidence about it? The Academy of
Medical Sciences rank it at #14.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6474053.stm#drugs
--
Dr John Watson
Baker Street
|
