Re: =>Albert Hofmann, Inventor of LSD, Embarks on Final Trip <=

On May 2, 5:00 pm, Joel <jo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> M_P <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> >> >> I don't even need to specifically refute why you're wrong.  If
anyon=
e
> >> >> doesn't get it, they are ****ing retarded.
> >> >[=85]
> >> >> If you don't
> >> >> know that, you are wayyy beneath my level on drug knowledge, and
you=

> >> >> can go educate yourself.
>
> >> >Coward.
>
> >> As if you've presented anything big to sup****t your points?  Please.
>
> >Since I haven't presented anything "big" by your self-serving
> >standards, you can present nothing at all? Cowardly and stupid.
>
> I've presented my ideas.  You have failed to discuss them.

Until you provide some reason to believe your baseless ideas, there is
no reason for anyone to discuss them apart from pointing out their
lack of basis.

> you are wrong, and you are avoiding admitting it.

Provide evidence that you're right and I'll admit it.

> >> >Nonsense. Anyone punished under that law is coerced.
>
> >> Most LSD busts are of dealers, not users.
>
> >But not all -- ergo, there is coercion.
>
> Of people stupid enough to get caught, sure, I guess.  It's pretty
> irrelevant on the grand scale, though.

Coercion of the stupid is irrelevant? We'll have to agree to disagree
there ... I think even stupid people have rights (for which you should
be grateful).

> >> >And the government that passed these bans didn't think so?
>
> >> I certainly hope they weren't that naive.
>
> >Your hopes mean squat. If they didn't think the laws would be
> >effective, why did they bother? Just so they could be anal-retentively
> >consistent?
>
> That is certainly one aspect of it, yes.

A clearly ridiculous theory.