Re: a major undertaking, but the rewards would be more than worth it

That reminds me of Kato Calin (spelling???) who lived with OJ on and
of
and was rumored by many as a drug dealer who supplied OJ and ma
other high profile people - singers, actors, s****ts stars, mvie
exeutives
and so on.

Didn't he play Bat Boy in some of the Bat Man series??



Jake Blues wrote:
> <collection60@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1179852884.042473.118730@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > LSD sucks anyhow.
> >
> > Try mushrooms.
> >
>
> I have. They're okay, certainly easier to obtain. But they're not as
good as
> LSD. They're a "dirty" hallucinogen. LSD.25 is a clean drug. We had a
> discussion some time ago about all the additional chemicals in mushrooms
> besides psilocybin/psilocin. All these chemicals can affect the
experience
> at least marginally, and you don't really know which ones you're
getting, or
> in what ratio. Lsd.25 is LSD.25, period. I'm not saying you always get
pure,
> uncut LSD. Hell, I'm sure most of the time it's cut or adulterated with
some
> impurity or other, especially blotter acid. But good, clean, pure LSD.25
> beats the shrooms any day, IMO. Also, I think your brain handles acid
better
> than it handles shrooms, in the sense that the effects are very ---
concise,
> for lack of a better word; very mathematical, geometric, just as reality
is.
> Even alternatives such as non-Euclidian geometry is still geometry. I'm
> guessing I've taken mushrooms perhaps a dozen times over the years, the
last
> time being five years ago, and I've usually felt sorta ****ed-up and
spacey
> for a few days afterwards, and as often as not, I've gotten a cold. At
the
> end of an acid trip, I've just felt that all the equations have balanced
out
> again, and just went on with life. Mushrooms can be fun, but they're not
> *logical* like LSD is. I can easily see how that physicist, himself a
> regular user of acid, won the Nobel prize. Acid aided/augmented his
logical
> thinking. If he used mushrooms regularly like that, --- well, who knows
> where he'd be, but I'm entirely sure he couldn't have accomplished
whatever
> it was that got him the Nobel prize. His name escapes me, but he
testified
> at the O.J Simpson trial.