On Nov 20, 4:14 am, Deena M. Ladd <DeenaL...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Evidence for the involvement of technologically advanced knowledge at
> points scattered throughout human history is easy to find, and we are
> ready to tell you how.
>
> You've discovered molecular structure, and can operate very good 3D
> modeling systems that demonstrate their structures and behaviors
> perfectly. You've also developed sophisticated 2D schematica to
> describe various aspects of molecular arrangement which are very much
> relevant to what you need to know to reveal our intervention
> throughout your history.
>
> The intervention you uncover will be undeniable by any government or
> other organization, and this is deliberate.
>
> The most relevant thing about the relatively recent advancements in
> your understanding of molecular structure involve some of the systems
> of 2D schemata much more so than any realistic 3D model - we didn't
> know you'd become so efficient at 3D so quickly, and so while this may
> not be the best way for the technology you've actually managed to
> evolve, it was nonetheless intentional, and in some ways increases the
> strength of the evidence for the connection to your past and the
> knowledge of molecular structure you've picked up on so quickly today.
> Via this connection, which will become increasingly evident the more
> it is studied (and some are, naturally, already doing this, we're just
> giving you an additional little pointer here), the evidence will
> eventually become incontrovertible that advanced technology has
> existed outside of human society for millennia. Be it technological
> society from humanity's own descendants, or extraterrestrial
> technology, the concept needs to be absorbed before Earth can move on
> much further in the relation****p between human society and the rest of
> the sentient universe.
>
> Study your 2D schematic structures, you should be able to intuit which
> ones are most likely to be relevant. You will find many of these
> structures represented blatantly in one form or another in works of
> art and science throughout history, even a little bit in the human
> version of prehistory (we remember when there were dinosaurs on your
> world, so yes, we've been here awhile - some of the very same minds
> who are talking to you today, not just our ancestors - hope that
> doesn't freak anyone out who is capable of believing it <G>). Study
> also methods for representing musical notes in 2D ways - the 5-line
> system you have is completely off the mark for the purposes we're
> discussing here, but you can intuit other methods of 2D musical
> representation which will eventually lead you to the discovery of 2D
> musical representation systems that convert some ancient tunes and
> writings into precise molecular structures in accordance with some of
> the 2D schematic systems you've already developed today.
>
> Good luck, we wish only the best for you. This is the evidence you've
> been waiting for, and as you figure it out, it -will- be undeniable.
Thank you ...
|
