On Feb 26, 9:21 am, "Neo" <yos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 21, 11:42 pm, "Lizard" <lizardpri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > The Olney's lesions theory was ignited by White's otherwise excellent
> > but somewhat alarmist DXM faq, and he has now repudiated that section.
>
> > Lizard
>
> Ahem.
>
> It looks like mr white stated - "there is impairment from DXM use and
> it is attributable to NAN" to "there is impairment from DXM and it may
> or
> may not be from NAN".
um..... yeah, that was pretty much my whole point. There is NO
EVIDENCE of it. If you read White a little further he goes on to say
that even the anecdotal evidence he uses to claim "It might" is very
weak. Having looked through them, I think 'very weak' might be a
radical understatement, and "Probable Bull****" is a bit closer to the
mark.
Basically, I can claim that DXM puts you in touch with the Roswell
Grey Aliens who then attempt to mind-meld with you to give you the
secrets of faster-than-light travel and have more and better anecdotal
evidence than there is for a NAN-DXM connection. There are about 60
trip re****ts that claim, with very small variations, exactly that.
Now, do you think that evidence rises to the level of something we
should be warning people about?
Lizard
|
