"Lizard" <lizardpriest@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> It's not enough to say it hasn't been proven, and it's wrong to say
>> that there isn't any convincing anecdotal evidence. Some people
>> really get addicted to high-plateau DXM trips, and show signs of
>> damage that would be consistent with NAN. It's not the most im****tant
>> issue, I think, but it's certainly a relevant one.
>
>I really don't mean to start a flame war, and I am not trying to piss
>you off, but there honestly is no convincing anecdotal evidence. I
>think that it is just as necessary to have evidence when claiming
>something can hurt you in a specifc way as it is to claim something
>WONT. And this simply doesn't pass muster. ****, there is enough bad
>information out there about drugs that we don't need to be adding
>either to the hysteria against drugs or the blind promotion of them.
I'm not telling people not to dex. I'm telling them to dex
intelligently. It has nothing to do with "hysteria against drugs".
I've dexed hundreds of times, with no signs of NAN - but I limited my
use of high doses.
>> >Now, if what you are talking about is S*****onin Syndrome (a different
>> >thing altogether) you are on firmer ground. While rare, and almost
>> >always as a side effect of mixing SSRI's with very high doses of DXM,
>> >it has been recorded. S*****onin Syndrome is tem****ary (if it doesn't
>> >kill you, that is) and does not cause degenerative damage.
>>
>> I'm not sure why you considered that related to anything I said.
>
>I thought you might be confusing NAN and S*****onin Syndrome, is all.
>If you arent, then it had nothing to do with what you said at all.
The symptoms don't seem very similar, from what I can gather.
--
Joel Crump
|
