On Feb 24, 10:17 pm, Joel <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> It's not enough to say it hasn't been proven, and it's wrong to say
> that there isn't any convincing anecdotal evidence. Some people
> really get addicted to high-plateau DXM trips, and show signs of
> damage that would be consistent with NAN. It's not the most im****tant
> issue, I think, but it's certainly a relevant one.
I really don't mean to start a flame war, and I am not trying to piss
you off, but there honestly is no convincing anecdotal evidence. I
think that it is just as necessary to have evidence when claiming
something can hurt you in a specifc way as it is to claim something
WONT. And this simply doesn't pass muster. ****, there is enough bad
information out there about drugs that we don't need to be adding
either to the hysteria against drugs or the blind promotion of them.
>
> >Now, if what you are talking about is S*****onin Syndrome (a different
> >thing altogether) you are on firmer ground. While rare, and almost
> >always as a side effect of mixing SSRI's with very high doses of DXM,
> >it has been recorded. S*****onin Syndrome is tem****ary (if it doesn't
> >kill you, that is) and does not cause degenerative damage.
>
> I'm not sure why you considered that related to anything I said.
I thought you might be confusing NAN and S*****onin Syndrome, is all.
If you arent, then it had nothing to do with what you said at all.
Lizard
|
